Search Federal District Court Opinions & Orders
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Opinion/Order Dates:
and
Search Federal District Court Opinions & Orders - Full Text Search
Search Opinion Text:
Cases Filed In:


Browse by Judge

 



Fair Labor Standards Act Opinions from the Georgia Southern District Court

Results 1 - 5 of 5
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action Case filed
February 8, 2007
Clairday et al v. Tire Kingdom, Inc. et al
court opinions & orders
GA Southern Alaimo Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act February 8, 2007
Plaintiff: Larry Clairday, Jr., John Thibault; Defendant: Tire Kingdom, Inc., NTW, Incorporated, Merchant's Tire and Auto Centers, TBC Corporation, Sumitomo Corporation of America
 
November 17, 2006
Haman v. Qantum of Brunswick
court opinions & orders
GA Southern Alaimo Fair Labor Standards Act Sherman-Clayton Act November 17, 2006
September 26, 2006
Schiefer v. The United States of America et al
court opinions & orders
GA Southern Alaimo Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act September 26, 2006
September 25, 2006
Ramos-Barrientos et al v. Bland et al
court opinions & orders
GA Southern Edenfield Fair Labor Standards Act Venue Generally September 25, 2006
April 28, 2006
Vanover,etal vs West Telemarketing, etal
court opinions & orders
GA Southern Alaimo Fair Labor Standards Act Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards April 28, 2006
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Written Opinions site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.