U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Kentucky
Cases 1 - 10 of 32,229
SS Advisory, LLC v. Bluegrass Dryp Wound Care, LLC
as 0:2025cv00058
Plaintiff:
SS Advisory, LLC
Defendant:
Bluegrass Dryp Wound Care, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Riley v. Warden Entzel
as 0:2025cv00057
Petitioner:
Cleon Riley
Respondent:
Warden Entzel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Maziarz v. SSA
as 3:2025cv00024
Plaintiff:
Steven Maziarz
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Shields v. USA
as 5:2025cv00181
Petitioner:
Robert Lee Shields
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Gardner v. Buchanan et al
as 5:2025cv00180
Plaintiff:
Troy Gardner
Defendant:
Officer Leon Buchanan, Vice Mayor Linda Gorton, Chief Lawrence Weathers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Adams v. Crews et al
as 0:2025cv00056
Plaintiff:
Kevin L. Adams
Defendant:
Cookie Crews, Donald McKenzie, Captain Chad Tackett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. SSA
as 6:2025cv00092
Plaintiff:
Kellie Rae Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Devault v. Paul, Warden
as 5:2025cv00179
Petitioner:
James Devault
Respondent:
David Paul, Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Guinn v. Manchester Federal Satellite Camp
as 6:2025cv00090
Petitioner:
Devon Miles Guinn
Respondent:
Warden of Manchester Federal Satellite Camp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Baldwin v. Hilliard
as 6:2025cv00091
Petitioner:
Stephen Baldwin
Respondent:
Warden Hilliard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
