Search Federal District Court Opinions & Orders
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Opinion/Order Dates:
and
Search Federal District Court Opinions & Orders - Full Text Search
Search Opinion Text:
Cases Filed In:


Judge Carl Horn III Labor Opinions from the North Carolina Western District Court




Judge Carl Horn III Labor Opinions from the North Carolina Western District Court
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action Case filed
May 23, 2007
Johnson v. Coca Cola Bottling Company
court opinions & orders
NC Western Horn Fair Labor Standards Act Fair Labor Standards Act May 23, 2007
Plaintiff: James Johnson; Defendant: Coca Cola Bottling Company
 
March 30, 2007
Sianipar et al v. GTN Employment Agency, Inc. et al
court opinions & orders
NC Western Horn Fair Labor Standards Act Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards March 30, 2007
Plaintiff: Andre Airlangga Sianipar, I Komang Agus Suryata, Made Indra Budiawan; Defendant: GTN Employment Agency, Inc., Leeta Kang, Simon Kang, Art Bridgman, Mike Moore and others...
 
January 11, 2007
Bio-Medical Applications of North Carolina, Inc. v. Brooks Food Group, Inc. et al
court opinions & orders
NC Western Horn Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A. January 11, 2007
Plaintiff: Bio-Medical Applications of North Carolina, Inc.; Defendant: Brooks Food Group, Inc., Brooks Food Group, Inc. Employee Benefit Plan
 
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Written Opinions site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.