Search Federal District Court Opinions & Orders
Party Name (optional):
Cases Filed In:
Lawsuit Type:
Show:
Cases Filed:
and
Opinion/Order Dates:
and
Search Federal District Court Opinions & Orders - Full Text Search
Search Opinion Text:
Cases Filed In:


Labor Opinions from Federal District Courts in Ohio

Browse by Court

 



Labor Opinions from Federal District Courts in Ohio
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Parties District Court Judge Type of Lawsuit Cause of Action Case filed
June 12, 2007
Clark et al v. Stanley Staffing
court opinions & orders
OH Northern Dowd Fair Labor Standards Act Denial of Overtime Compensation June 12, 2007
Plaintiff: Tomasina Clark, Kristopher Sanderson; Defendant: Stanley Staffing, Inc.
 
June 1, 2006
Muffley v. Ohio and Vincinity Regional Council of Carpenters
court opinions & orders
OH Southern Smith Labor/Management Relations National Labor Relations Act June 1, 2006
March 1, 2006
Boyd v. American Electric Power System Long-Term Disability Plan
court opinions & orders
OH Southern King Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits March 1, 2006
June 3, 2005
Musarra et al v. Digital Dish, Inc.
court opinions & orders
OH Southern Marbley Fair Labor Standards Act Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards June 3, 2005
July 29, 2002
Clevenger v. Dillards Dept Stores, et al
court opinions & orders
OH Southern Beckwith Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits July 29, 2002
         
Featured Case Includes court opinions, orders, and all eFiling documents (complaint, responses, associated filings).
Opinions Available Includes court opinions & orders.
Add to your RSS Reader Add to your Google Add to your My Yahoo Add to your My MSN Add to your My AOL Add to your Feedster Add to your Newsgator Add to your Bloglines Add to your NewsBurst Add to your Rojo Add to your Pluck
The Justia Federal District Court Written Opinions site republishes public litigation records retrieved from the US Federal District Courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, and do not necessarily reflect the view of Justia.