Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Granito, v. United States
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. - 183 F.2d 990
Argued June 19, 1950.Decided July 3, 1950
Mr. Hans A. Nathan, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Mr. Richard M. Roberts, Asst. U.S. Atty, Washington, D.C., with whom Messrs. George Morris Fay, U.S. Atty, Harold H. Bacon and Joseph M. Howard, Asst. U.S. Attys, all of Washington, D.C., were on the brief, for appellee.
Before CLARK, PROCTOR, and BAZELON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We find no error in the record on this appeal. The credibility of the complaining witness' story of how appellant unlawfully came into possession of his automobile was a matter peculiarly within the province of the jury. Likewise the court's instructions were in all respects adequate for the purposes of this case.
Affirmed.