Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
George Stefanelli, Appellant, v. Duane E. Minard, Jr., Prosecutor for Essex County, New Jersey, et al.jerry Malanga, Joseph Maglione and Frank D'innocenzio, Appellants, v. Duane E. Minard, Jr., Prosecutor for Essex County, New Jersey, et al
United States Court of Appeals, Third Circuit. - 184 F.2d 575
Argued October 19, 1950 Decided October 31, 1950
Appeal from United States District Court for the District of New Jersey, Meaney, Judge.
Anthony A. Calandra, Newark, N. J., for appellants.
C. William Caruso, Newark, N. J., for Minard.
Vincent J. Casale, Newark, N. J., (Charles Handler, Newark, N. J., on the brief), for other appellees.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The appeals in the instant cases are without merit. Every question here raised by the appellants can be asserted by them in the New Jersey State Courts and the way to the Supreme Court of the United States lies open. Federal courts should not enjoin criminal proceedings in state courts save in exceptional cases to prevent irreparable injury which is clear and imminent. Douglas v. City of Jeannette, 319 U.S. 157, 63 S.Ct. 877, 87 L.Ed. 1324. As to the application of the principles of the Fourth Amendment to the cases at bar see Wolf v. People of State of Colorado, 338 U.S. 25, 69 S.Ct. 1359, 93 L.Ed. 1782. The judgments will be affirmed.