Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Tivoli Realty, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., et al., Interstate Circuit, Inc., and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., Appellants.tivoli Realty, Inc. v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.; Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Loew's Inc.; Radio-keith-orpheum Corp.; Rko Radio Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp.; Twentieth Century-fox Film Corp.; Columbia Pictures Corp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures, Inc., and Universal Film Exchange, Inc., Appellants.i. B. Adelman v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., et al. Interstate Circuit, Inc. and Texas Consolidated Theatres, Inc., Appellants.i. B. Adelman v. Paramount Pictures, Inc., et al. Paramount Pictures, Inc.; Paramount Film Distributing Corp.; Lowe's Inc.; Radio-keith-orpheum Corp.; Rko Radio Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures, Inc.; Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp.; Twentieth Century-fox Film Corp.; Columbia Pictures Corp.; United Artists Corp.; Universal Pictures, Inc., and Universal Film Exchange, Inc., Appellants
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. - 186 F.2d 120
Argued October 3, 1950 Decided December 6, 1950
Robert E. Sher, Washington, D. C., Roy McDonald, New York City (Richards, Layton & Finger, Wilmington, Del., Hastings, Stockly, Walz & Wise, Wilmington, Del., Morris Steel, Nichols & Arsht, Wilmington, Del., Southerland, Berl & Potter, Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellants.
Thurman Arnold, Washington, D. C. (Killoran & Van Brunt, Wilmington Del., Arnold, Fortas & Porter, Washington, D. C., Thompson, Meek & Goldberg, Dallas, Tex., on the brief), for appellees.
Before BIGGS, Chief Judge, and MARIS, GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER, STALEY and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The order complained of is not appealable under Section 1291 or Section 1292, Title 28 United States Code Annotated. See the opinion filed concurrently with this in Paramount Pictures, Inc., v. Rodney, 186 F.2d 111, petitions for mandamus.
The appeals will be dismissed.