Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google
News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
National Labor Relations Board v. Westex Boot & Shoe Co
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. - 190 F.2d 556
August 14, 1951
Maurice Alexandre, Atty., N.L.R.B., David P. Findling, Associate Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., A. Norman Somers, Asst. Gen. Counsel, N.L.R.B., Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Lee Sellers, Otis E. Nelson, Wichita Falls, Tex., for respondent.
Before McCORD, RUSSELL, and RIVES, Circuit Judges.
RIVES, Circuit Judge.
The Company complains that the Court did not expressly pass upon its contention that all of the unfair labor practices, except the discharge of seven employees for their union activities, were barred by limitation under Section 10(b) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, U.S.C.A. Title 29, § 160(b). The sole ground for that contention, as expressed in the petition for rehearing, is that, "These other unfair labor practices have never been the subject of a charge to the Board". In concluding that the Board had power to issue the complaint based on such other alleged unfair labor practices, we held that the complaint merely "elaborated the charge with particularity." It follows that none of the unfair labor practices charged in the complaint were barred by limitation.
The petition for rehearing is
Denied.