Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Parker et al. v. Lester et al
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. - 191 F.2d 1020
Oct. 10, 1951
Gladstein, Andersen & Leonard and Allan Brotsky, San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.
Holmes Baldridge, Asst. Atty. Gen., Chauncey Tramutolo, U.S. Atty., San Francisco, Cal., Edward H. Hickey, Marvin C. Taylor, Atty., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for appellees.
Before MATHEWS, BONE and ORR, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This appeal is from an interlocutory order refusing an injunction sought by appellants in an action by appellants against appellees- an action still pending in the District Court. Appellants took the appeal on July 2, 1951, but failed to prosecute it. Appellees have caused the record on appeal to be certified and transmitted to this court, have caused the appeal to be docketed in this court and have moved this court to dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction. This court has jurisdiction of the appeal under 28 U.S.C.A. § 1292 and hence could not properly dismiss it for want of jurisdiction. However, appellants have filed in this court a paper entitled 'Withdrawal and abandonment of appeal', from which it appears that they do not desire or intent to prosecute the appeal. The appeal is therefore dismissed for want of prosecution.