Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Parker v. Warden, Maryland Penitentiary
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. - 198 F.2d 72
Argued June 16, 1952 Decided July 18, 1952
James Parker, II, pro se.
Kenneth C. Proctor, Asst. Atty. Gen., of Maryland (Hall Hammond, Atty. Gen., of Maryland, on the brief), for appellee.
Before PARKER, Chief Judge, and SOPER and DOBIE, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Appellant with two co-defendants pleaded guilty to the crime of robbery and was sentenced to a term of imprisonment by a Maryland state court. He complains because he was not granted the same reduction of sentence that was later accorded his co-defendants and asks that he be released from imprisonment under his sentence on that ground. The Maryland Court has denied a petition based on the same ground. Parker v. Warden Maryland Penitentiary Md., 84 A.2d 68. It is perfectly clear that the petition for habeas corpus was properly denied, as the failure or refusal of the state court to reduce appellant's sentence when reducing the sentence of his co-defendants could not possibly render his sentence void so as to authorize his release under habeas corpus by a federal court. The appeal is entirely without merit and the order appealed from would accordingly be affirmed if the case were properly before us. In as much, however, as appellant has failed to obtain from the judge who signed the order appealed from a certificate of probable cause, as required by 28 U.S.C.A. § 2253, we are without jurisdiction to entertain the appeal and it must be dismissed. Berman v. Swenson, Warden, 4 Cir., 177 F. 2d 717; Bernard v. Brady, Warden, 4 Cir., 164 F.2d 881.
Appeal dismissed.