Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Baley, v. Tondre, Warden
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. - 199 F.2d 28
Sept. 9, 1952
Robert S. Appel, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
James B. Cooney, Asst. Atty. Gen., of New Mexico (Joe L. Martinez, Atty. Gen. of New Mexico, and W. F. Kitts, Asst. Atty. Gen. of New Mexico, were with him on the brief), for appellee.
Before PHILLIPS, Chief Judge, and MURRAH and PICKETT, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The petitioner, an inmate of the New Mexico State Penitentiary, brought this habeas corpus proceeding in the Federal district court for the District of New Mexico alleging that he was unlawfully held by the Warden of that institution. The district court denied the application and this appeal was taken.
A hearing was had upon the application and the trial court found that no proceedings had been instituted in the state court to test the validity of the detention and the record does not disclose that at the time of the hearing there was any justification for failure to exhaust the available state remedies. Under such circumstances, the Federal district court will not ordinarily entertain an application for habeas corpus. Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587, 94 L.Ed. 761.
Affirmed.