Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Arthur Kahn Co., Inc. v. Switzer Brothers, Inc. et al
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. - 201 F.2d 55
December 18, 1952
John F. Oberlin, Cleveland, Ohio and George B. Finnegan, Jr., New York City, for appellant.
Albert L. Ely, Albert L. Ely, Jr. and Charles B. Gordon, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellees.
Before ALLEN, MARTIN and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause has been heard upon appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio, 101 F.Supp. 541, denying a motion for temporary injunction forbidding defendants (now appellees) from prosecuting a patent infringement suit in the Northern District of Texas until final judgment has been rendered in the case at bar;
And it appearing that, as of today, an appeal is now pending in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit from a decree of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas in such patent infringement suit, and this court being of opinion that, regardless of whether or not the United States District Court for the Northern District of Ohio whose order is sought to be reviewed and reversed in this case or the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas, or both, erred in not staying the prosecution of the suit in the latter named jurisdiction until final judgment has been rendered in the first mentioned jurisdiction, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, upon the plainest principles of judicial comity, should not and will not attempt to interfere with an action now pending on appeal in the United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit;
Accordingly, the motion to dismiss the appeal in this cause is granted; and the appeal is consequently dismissed.