Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN
Web Search
Yahoo!
Web Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google
Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google
Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
John N. Lucas, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit. - 210 F.2d 23
Jan. 21, 1954
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia.
On appellant's motion to dismiss appeal, to vacate judgment, and to remand case for resentencing.
Mr. Armand I. Robinson, Washington, D.C., for appellant.
Mr. Lewis A. Carroll, Asst. U.S. Atty., Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before STEPHENS, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN and BAZELON, Circuit judges.
[93 U.S.App.D.C. 415] PER CURIAM.
The appellant was jointly indicted, for violation of D.C. Code Title 22, Sec. 2901 (1951), with the appellant in Thomas v. United States, 93 U.S.App.D.C.-, 210 F.2d 21, decided this day. Like Thomas, the appellant was convicted, after he had entered a plea of guilty, and was sentenced to serve six years and eight months to twenty years. The appellant then moved to 'vacate or correct illegal sentence.' That motion was denied by the District Court on June 19, 1953. But that court, the same day, granted leave to the appellant to proceed on appeal without prepayment of costs. The sole issue on appeal in this case, as in Thomas v. United States, is whether the sentence imposed was greater than the maximum permissible by law. For the reasons stated in the opinion in the Thomas case, it was. Therefore, in view of the decision in Thomas v. United States, we reverse the order of the District Court denying appellant's motion to vacate sentence and we remand for resentencing under D.C. Code Title 22, Section 2901.
It is so ordered.