Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Dina Manufacturing Co., Inc., Merry Modes, Inc., and B. C.novelty Co., a Copartnership Composed of Benjaminclements, Irwin Clements and Alanclements, Petitioningcreditors-appellees, v. Nathaniel Segal, Alleged Bankrupt-appellant
United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit. - 220 F.2d 36
Argued Feb. 11, 1955.Decided Feb. 28, 1955
Lionel Golub, New York City, for appellant.
Benjamin H. Booth, New York City (Booth, Lipton & Lipton, New York City, and Edgar H. Booth, Brooklyn, N.Y., on the brief), for appellees.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, HINCKS, Circuit Judge, and SMITH, District judge.
PER CURIAM.
We agree with Judge Bruchhausen's reconciliation of Dworsky v. Alanjay Bias Binding Corp., 2 Cir., 182 F.2d 803, and Glint Factors v. Schnapp, 2 Cir., 126 F.2d 207, and his holding that the original petition in this case, describing the date, amount, and type of transfer, sufficiently identified the transaction alleged as the act of bankruptcy.
Affirmed.