Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Ranco, Inc., Respondent
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. - 222 F.2d 543
April 27, 1955
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Bernard Ness, Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
Eugene B. Schwartz and V. J. Einhart of Stanley, Smoyer & Schwartz, Cleveland, Ohio, for respondent.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and ALLEN and MARTIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This cause came on to be heard on the petition of the National Labor Relations Board for enforcement of its order directing the respondent company to cease and desist from prohibiting the distribution of union literature by union representatives on the company's parking lot, except pursuant to reasonable regulations or control of such character as not to deny them access to the company's employees for the purpose of distributing such literature; and directing the respondent to rescind its plant rule concerning such distribution on its parking lot at its plant in Delaware, Ohio, except pursuant to reasonable regulations of such character as not to deny union representatives access to its employees for the purpose of distributing its literature;
And it appearing, upon a review of the record as a whole, that there is substantial evidence to support the findings of fact of the board;
And it appearing further that, in our judgment, the board properly applied the principles of decisions in the following cases, N.L.R.B. v. Monarch Machine Tool Co., 6 Cir., 210 F.2d 183, 184-187, certiorari denied 347 U.S. 967, 74 S.Ct. 778, 98 L.Ed. 1109; N.L.R.B. v. Lake Superior Lumber Corp., 6 Cir., 167 F.2d 147, 150; N.L.R.B. v. Le Tourneau Co. of Georgia, 324 U.S. 793, 797, 798, 65 S.Ct. 982, 89 L.Ed. 1372;
The petition of the labor board for enforcement of its order is granted as prayed by it.