Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Mary D. May, Petitioner, v. District of Columbia, Respondent
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. - 228 F.2d 53
Submitted November 2, 1955 Decided November 23, 1955
Mr. Louis M. Denit, Washington, D. C., with whom Messrs. Thomas S. Jackson, P. Baxter Davis and Martin R. Fain, Washington, D. C., were on the brief, submitted on the brief for petitioner.
Mr. George C. Updegraff, Asst. Corp. Counsel for District of Columbia, with whom Messrs. Vernon E. West, Corp. Counsel, and Chester H. Gray, Principal Asst. Corp. Counsel, were on the brief, submitted on the brief for respondent.
Before EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and WILBUR K. MILLER and FAHY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The District of Columbia Tax Court affirmed the Assessor's appraisal of certain shares of stock owned by Arthur J. May at his death in 1950. The question for us to decide is whether the Tax Court was clearly wrong. District of Columbia v. Pace, 320 U.S. 698, 64 S.Ct. 406, 88 L. Ed. 408. We think it was not clearly wrong.
Affirmed.