Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Virgil Herdman, Appellant, v. Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. - 228 F.2d 902
Dec. 13, 1955
Donald S. McNamara, Kenneth Agee, Columbus, Ohio, for appellant.
Robert L. Barton, Columbus, Ohio, for appellee.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant is a freight conductor employed by the appellee railroad company. He brought this action under the Federal Employers' Liability Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq., for injuries he received while riding in the caboose of a freight train in the course of his employment. This appeal is from the judgment of the district court entered upon a directed verdict for the appellee railroad.
The appellant himself was his only witness at the trial. He testified that his injuries were received when he was thrown to the floor of the caboose by an emergency stop made by the train at a time when it was proceeding at a speed of from eight to ten miles an hour. An official report signed by him after the accident stated that the emergency stop had been made to avoid striking an automobile at a grade crossing.
We think the district judge correctly performed his duty in directing a verdict for the appellee. There was 'a complete absence of probative facts to support the conclusion' of negligence. Lavender v. Kurn, 1946, 327 U.S. 645, 66 S.Ct. 740, 90 L.Ed. 916. And negligence. remains the sole basis of liability under the Federal Employers' Liability Act. Tiller v. Atlantic Coast Line R. Co., 1943, 318 U.S. 54, 63 S.Ct. 444, 87 L.Ed. 610.
The judgment is affirmed.