Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google
Web Search
MSN
Web Search
Yahoo!
Web Search
in the News
Google
News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google
Blog Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google
Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Clarence E. Tyler, Petitioner, Appellant, v. v. L. Pepersack, Warden, Maryland Penitentiary, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. - 235 F.2d 29
Argued June 5, 1956 Decided June 18, 1956
Clarence E. Tyler, pro se.
James H. Norris, Jr., Sp. Asst. Atty. Gen. of Maryland (C. Ferdinand Sybert, Atty. Gen., and Stedman Prescott, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., of Maryland, on the brief), for appellee.
Before PARKER, Chief Judge, SOPER, Circuit Judge, and MOORE, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order denying a petition for a writ of habeas corpus by a prisoner incarcerated under the judgment and sentence of a court of the state of Maryland. The petition was properly denied for the reason that the contentions raised in the petition had been passed on by the Court of Appeals of Maryland, Tyler v. Warden of Md. Penitentiary, 206 Md. 635, 109 A.2d 919, and there was nothing to show that they had not been properly considered and passed on by that tribunal. Brown v. Allen, 344 U.S. 443, 457-458, 73 S.Ct. 397, 97 L.Ed. 469. Furthermore, state remedies have not been exhausted in that no application has been made to the Supreme Court of the United States for certiorari to review the action of the state courts. Darr v. Burford, 339 U.S. 200, 70 S.Ct. 587, 94 L.Ed. 761. If the case were properly before us, we would accordingly affirm the action of the court below. The appeal must be dismissed, however, for failure of appellant to obtain the certificate of probable cause required by 28 U.S.C. § 2253. Cumberland v. (Pepersack) Warden, 4 Cir., 227 F.2d 310.
Appeal dismissed.