Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
North American Airlines, Inc., Petitioner, v. Civil Aeronautics Board, Respondent, American Airlines,inc., Intervenor
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. - 235 F.2d 863
Decided July 12, 1956.Petitions for Rehearing Denied Sept. 18, 1956
Messrs. Hardy K. Maclay and Walter D. Hansen, Washington, D.C., and Walter J. Derenberg, New York City, for petitioner.
Messrs. Franklin M. Stone, Gen. Counsel, John H. Wanner, Associate Gen. Counsel, O. D. Ozment, Chief, Litigation and Research Division, and Gerald F. Krassa, Atty., Civil Aeronautics Board, and Charles H. Weston, Atty., Department of Justice, for respondent.
Messrs. Howard C. Westwood, John W. Douglas, Jerome Ackerman, Clifton J. Stratton, Jr., and J. Randolph Wilson, Washington, D.C., for intervenor.
Before PRETTYMAN, FAHY and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This case is before us now on remand from the Supreme Court, American Airlines v. North American Airlines, 351 U.S. 79, 76 S.Ct. 600. In the light of the decision of the Supreme Court we hold that upon consideration of the record as a whole the finding of the Board that the use by petitioner of the name 'North American Airlines, Inc.,' 'North American Airlines,' or 'North American,' causes substantial public confusion which is likely to continue, is supported by the evidence. We accordingly affirm the order of the Board insofar as it denies the application of petitioner for authority to engage in air transportation under the name North American Airlines, Inc., and orders it to cease and desist from engaging in air transportation under the names North American Airlines, Inc., North American Airlines, or North American. But the evidence does not support the finding of the Board that the term 'American' had acquired a secondary meaning before petitioner incorporated that term in its name or changed its corporate name, or the finding that such secondary meaning continues to exist. Accordingly, we set aside the order of the Board insofar as it orders petitioner to cease and desist engaging in air transportation under any other name which includes the word 'American.'
In view of the foregoing and because of the representations made to us by motion of intervenor, American Airlines, Inc., that during the pendency of the remand petitioner has abandoned [98 U.S.App.D.C. 367] the use of the name North American Airlines, Inc., and is now using the name 'Trans American Airlines,' the case will be remanded to the Board for such further proceedings as it may be advised, and as are consistent with this opinion.
It is so ordered.