Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Appellee, v. John Dioguardi, Defendant-appellant
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. - 237 F.2d 57
Argued Sept. 25, 1956.Decided Sept. 27, 1956
Noah L. Braunstein, New York City, for defendant-appellant.
Thomas B. Gilchrist, Jr., Chief Asst. U.S. Atty., S.D.N.Y., New York City (Paul W. Williams, U.S. Atty., and Arthur H. Christy, Asst. U.S. Atty., New York City, on the brief), for appellee.
Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and FRANK and HINCKS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On the basis of the showing before us and having in mind the circumstances stated in F.R.Cr.P. 46(c), 18 U.S.C., as determining the amount of bail which 'will insure the presence of the defendant,' we do not feel justified at this time in interfering with the discretion exercised by the district judges in refusing to reduce the bail for defendant pending trial heretofore fixed, particularly in view of the prospect of speedy trial, now set for October 15, 1956. The orders refusing to reduce the bail are therefore affirmed.