Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google
News Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
National Bible Knowledge Association, Inc., Appellant, v. Dumont Broadcasting Corporation, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. - 239 F.2d 74
Argued November 15, 1956 Decided November 29, 1956
Mr. Frank L. Peckham, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. Frank R. Long, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.
Mr. Edward G. Villalon, Washington, D. C., with whom Mr. William A. Roberts, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellee.
Before FAHY, DANAHER and BURGER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The appeal is from an order of the District Court denying plaintiff's motion there for a preliminary injunction. The injunction was sought on the basis of a complaint that defendant, appellee, in essence was attempting unlawfully to cancel a contract under which it was televising certain programs of plaintiff. Damages also were prayed. On oral argument before us appellant's counsel stated that the contract had expired, as also appears clearly from the record. He also represented that appellant asserts no claim of a present right to have its programs televised by appellee, under the contract or otherwise. Thus it appears that the appeal is moot and that any remaining controversy has to do only with the question of damages, which has not been decided by the District Court. The appeal, therefore, must be dismissed as moot. In addition, the findings of fact and conclusions of law upon which the District Court rested its denial of the motion for a preliminary injunction will be set aside, and the case remanded for such further proceedings as may be appropriate. Cf. Amalgamated Ass'n, etc., Motor Coach Employees v. Wisconsin Employment Relations Board, 340 U.S. 416, 71 S.Ct. 373, 95 L.Ed. 389.1
It is so ordered.
The reason the findings of fact and conclusions of law are set aside is that we are unable to review them due to the mootness of the appeal