Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Ralph SHINABERRY, Appellant,v.UNITED STATES of America, acting through the County Production and Marketing Administration Committee for Hillsdale County, State of Michigan, Hillsdale, Michigan, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. - 242 F.2d 758
March 6, 1957
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Michigan; Thomas F. McAllister, Circuit Judge, and Raymond W. Starr and W. Wallace Kent, District Judges.
George A. Meekison, Napoleon, Ohio, for appellant.
Wendell A. Miles, U. S. Atty., Grand Rapids, Mich., for appellee.
Before SIMONS, Chief Judge, and MARTIN and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Without attempting to avail himself of the administrative remedies provided in the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq., the appellant brought this action to restrain the United States from collecting penalties for violation of the statutes fixing wheat quotas, alleging that those statutes violated the Constitution.
It was the appellant's contention that the provisions of 28 U.S.C.A. § 2410(a) conferred upon the district court jurisdiction to entertain the action. The court held that section of the Code inapplicable, concluded that the United States has not consented to be sued in an action such as this, and accordingly dismissed the complaint. D.C., 142 F.Supp. 413 (1956).
For the reasons stated in the district court's opinion, the order of dismissal is affirmed.