Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google
Web Search
MSN
Web Search
Yahoo!
Web Search
in the News
Google
News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google
Blog Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google
Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Howard D. Abramowitz, Appellant, v. Wilber M. Brucker, Secretary of the Department of the Army, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. - 243 F.2d 834
Argued April 11, 1957 Decided April 26, 1957 Writ of Certiorari Granted June 17, 1957 See 77 S.Ct. 1383
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; Edward M. Curran, District Judge.
Mr. Victor Rabinowitz, New York City, of the bar of the Court of Appeals of New York, pro hac vice, by special leave of Court with whom Mr. David Rein, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellant.
Asst. Atty. Gen. George C. Doub, Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., Paul A. Sweeney, Donald B. MacGuineas and Howard E. Shapiro, Attys., Dept. of Justice, submitted on the brief for appellee.
Before BAZELON, FAHY and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
We are agreed that Harmon v. Brucker, 1957, 100 U.S.App.D.C. ___, 243 F.2d 613, is controlling here. If the question were open, Judge Bazelon would reverse for the reasons stated in his dissent in Harmon and Judge Fahy would wish to consider the question anew.
Affirmed.