Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google
Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo!
Web Search
in the News
Google
News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google
Blog Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google
Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Andreas Boulamandis, Appellant, v. Herbert Brownell, Jr., Attorney General of the United States, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. - 247 F.2d 83
Argued May 21, 1957 Decided June 13, 1957
Mr. Joseph J. Lyman for appellant.
Mr. Forbes W. Blair, Asst. U. S. Atty., with whom Messrs. Oliver Gasch, U. S. Atty., Lewis Carroll, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Joseph M. F. Ryan, Jr., Asst. U. S. Atty., at the time brief was filed, were on the brief for appellee.
Before PRETTYMAN, BAZELON and WASHINGTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant concedes that he is deportable but argues that the Board of Immigration Appeals (and later the District Court) erroneously held him not eligible for suspension of deportation under § 19 (c) (2) (b) of the Immigration Act of 1917, as amended July 1, 1948.1 To qualify under that statute appellant must have been "residing in the United States" on its effective date which was July 1, 1948. But appellant had left the country on January 18, 1947, in the exercise of a privilege of voluntary departure after an earlier order of deportation. An alien thus situated is not a resident of the United States. See Kristensen v. McGrath, 1949, 86 U.S.App.D.C. 48, 53-54, 179 F.2d 796, 801-802, affirmed, 1950, 340 U.S. 162, 71 S.Ct. 224, 95 L.Ed. 173. The judgment of the District Court is accordingly
Affirmed.
62 Stat. 1206, 8 U.S.C. § 155(c) (Supp. V, 1946) [Now Immigration and Nationality Act 1952, 8 U.S.C.A. §§ 1254(a) (1, 2), 1351]