Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Constantin Kotsampas, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee.petros Prassinos, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. - 257 F.2d 64
July 15, 1958
Phillip Bartell, Cleveland, Ohio, for appellants.
Loren G. Windom, Asst. U. S. Atty., Columbus, Ohio, for appellee. Hugh K. Martin, Columbus, Ohio, on the brief, for appellee.
Before MARTIN, McALLISTER and STEWART, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
These consolidated appeals were taken from judgments of conviction for violation of 8 U.S.C.A. § 1282(c). The appellants, alien crewmen, were found to have wilfully remained in the United States in excess of the time permitted by conditional landing permits which had been issued to them. The only substantial question raised by these appeals was whether the offense charged was continuous so as to permit prosecution in the Southern District of Ohio, where defendants were apprehended, or whether the offense was complete when the landing permits expired. This question has now been decided adversely to appellants' contention by the Supreme Court. United States v. Cores, 356 U.S. 405, 78 S.Ct. 875, 2 L.Ed.2d 873.
Accordingly the judgments of conviction must be and hereby are affirmed.