Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Evelyn Hawley Kennedy, Appellant v. Francis W. Hill, Jr., Executor of the Estate of Edgar S. Kennedy, Deceased, et al., Appellees
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. - 262 F.2d 26
Argued November 6, 1958 Decided November 20, 1958
Mr. Joseph O. Janousek, Washington, D. C., for appellant.
Mr. Edmund D. Campbell, Washington, D. C., for appellees.
Before WILBUR K. MILLER, FAHY and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
On October 19, 1949, Evelyn Hawley Kennedy married Edgar S. Kennedy, who was then about 80 years of age. They lived together until the spring of 1950, when a separation occurred. Negotiations for a financial settlement immediately began between the attorneys for the parties and culminated in an agreement dated and signed March 15, 1951. By its terms, the wife acknowledged the payment of $50,000 in satisfaction of all claims against her husband and his estate for support, maintenance, alimony or necessaries, and also in satisfaction of any claims she might have against Mary K. Nelms and Ida H. Sisson, relatives of her husband who she "inferred" had been influential in breaking up the marriage.
The husband died in August, 1953, and on October 1, 1956, Mrs. Kennedy filed this suit against his executors and beneficiaries. She sought to set aside the settlement contract as fraudulently obtained, to enjoin an immediate distribution of her husband's estate, and to obtain her distributable share as though there had been no settlement.
After taking Mrs. Kennedy's deposition, in which she disclaimed reliance upon the alleged fraud, the defendants moved for and were granted summary judgment. This appeal followed.
We have carefully examined the record and find no error.
Affirmed.