Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Appellant, v. John E. Murdock and Wife, Vera S. Murdock, Appellees
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. - 263 F.2d 146
Jan. 5, 1959
Charles K. Rice, Lee A. Jackson, Grant W. Wiprud, Washington, D.C., Millsaps Fitzhugh and Edward N. Vaden, Memphis, Tenn., for appellant.
Lowell W. Taylor, Memphis, Tenn., for appellees.
Before ALLEN, Chief Judge, SIMONS, Circuit Judge, and KENT, District judge.
PER CURIAM.
The General Insurance Agency of Tennessee, a corporation, distributed to its stockholders, including taxpayers here, certain shares of stock of the Universal Security Insurance Company and Apex Realty Company, which had been purchased for cash by General Insurance Agency.
The sole question on this appeal is whether such distribution of stock constituted a re-organization within the intent of Section 112(g)(1)(D) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939, 26 U.S.C.A. 112(g)(1)(D), so that the gain realized by the stockholders of the General Insurance Agency upon distribution of the stock was nontaxable under Section 112(b)(11) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1939.
District Judge Marion S. Boyd in comprehensive findings of fact and conclusions of law found that such distribution by General Insurance Agency was a nontaxable 'spin-off' within the meaning of Section 112(b)(11).
For the reasons stated by the District Judge in his findings of fact and conclusions of law the judgment in favor of the taxpayers in affirmed.