Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News
Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Unitex Industries, Inc., Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. - 267 F.2d 40
May 21, 1959
Wentworth T. Durant, Robert J. Hobby, Dallas, Tex., for petitioner.
George W. Beatty, Harry Baum, Lee A. Jackson, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Charles Owen Johnson, Sp. Atty., I.R.S., Arch M. Cantrall, Chief Counsel, I.R.S., Washington, D. C., Charles K. Rice, Asst. Atty. Gen., for respondent.
Before RIVES, CAMERON and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The Tax Court decided that certain payments made by the petitioner, Unitex Industries, Inc., were to be treated, for Federal income tax purposes, as dividends on its preferred stock rather than as deductible interest expense. Unitex Industries, Inc. v. Commissioner, 30 T.C. 468. We find ourselves in agreement with the determination of the Tax Court. See United States v. South Georgia Railway Co., 5 Cir., 1939, 107 F.2d 3; Staked Plains Trust, Ltd. v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 1944, 143 F.2d 421; Hercules Gasoline Co. v. Commissioner, 5 Cir., 1945, 147 F.2d 972, affirmed 326 U.S. 425, 66 S.Ct. 222, 90 L.Ed. 177, rehearing denied 326 U.S. 812, 66 S.Ct. 471, 90 L.Ed. 496. The decision of the Tax Court is
Affirmed.