Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Louis Cito, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. - 283 F.2d 49
Oct. 6, 1960
John M. Deisch of Enos, Buchler & Deisch, Denver, Colo., for appellant.
Charles M. Stoddard, Asst. U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo. (Donald G. Brotzman, U.S. Atty., Denver, Colo., on the brief), for appellee.
Before HUXMAN, LEWIS and BREITENSTEIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant filed a petition in the District Court for the District of Colorado for a Writ of Error Coram Nobis alleging that his conviction and subsequent sentence for conspriacy to burglarize and burglary of a United States post office were improper. His sole contention is that the evidence at trial did not show that the crime was perpetrated in that protion of the burglarized building dedicated to the functions of a federal post office. Relief was denied by trial court in the form sought and also as considered under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255.
The judgment is affirmed. Coram nobis is neither a substitute for direct appeal nor for proper relief under 2255. Adam v. United States, 10 Cir., 274 F.2d 880. Appellant's conviction was considered and affirmed on direct appeal, Cito v. United States, 10 Cir., 238 F.2d 766, and the collateral issues determined in a commpanion case, Skoog v. United States, 10 Cir., 268 F.2d 218.