Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Paul J. Kern, Plaintiff-appellant, v. A. J. Hettinger, Jr., Individually and As a Director of Thewestern Pacific Railroad Company, the Western Pacificrailroad Company, 'richard Rowe' Fictitious, the Real Nameof the Defendant or Defendants Being Unknown to Theplaintiff, Said Fictitious Name Being Intended to Designateany One or More Persons Who Were Directors of the Defendant,the Western Pacific Railroad Company Between the Months Ofjune and October 1957, Samuel P. Mason, the Chase Manhattanbank and the Chemical Corn Exchange Bank, Defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. - 290 F.2d 585
Argued April 21, 1961.Decided May 24, 1961
Eleanor Jackson Piel, New York City (Donner, Kinoy, Perlin & Piel, New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff-appellant.
Royall, Koegel & Rogers, New York City (John F. Caskey, Herbert C. Earnshaw, Donald A. Krenz, New York City, of counsel), for respondent Hettinger.
Milbank, Tweed, Hope & Hadley, New York City (A. Donald MacKinnon, Arthur V. Savage, New York City, of counsel), for Chase Manhattan Bank and Chemical Corn Exchange Bank.
Before WATERMAN, MOORE and SMITH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
When the within appeal was calendared for argument we examined the record filed by appellant. It clearly appears from that record that the appeal is premature inasmuch as the complaint sets forth a single claim for relief against multiple party defendants and there has been no final determination below as to one of these defendants.
Appeal dismissed for lack of appellate jurisdiction. Mull v. Ackerman, 2 Cir., 1960, 279 F.2d 25; Goldlawr, Inc. v. Heiman, 2 Cir., 1959, 273 F.2d 729.