Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News
Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Robert M. Dailey and Fred J. Dailey v. David Lee Timmer and Robert Pakulski, Appellants
United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit. - 292 F.2d 824
Argued June 22, 1961 Decided July 7, 1961
J. S. Jiuliante, Sr., Erie, Pa., for appellants.
John A. Blackmore, Erie, Pa. (Blackmore & Grieshober, Ostrow & Dailey, John J. Dailey, Erie, Pa., on the brief), for appellees.
Before GOODRICH, McLAUGHLIN and KALODNER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order granting a new trial entered by a judge for the District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania. Met with the statute 28 U.S.C. § 1291 which gives Courts of Appeals jurisdiction of all final decisions of District Courts (with certain exceptions not relevant here), the appellant urges upon us our own decision in Lind v. Schenley Industries, Inc., 3 Cir., 1960, 278 F.2d 79. That case has no bearing here. This Court, in that case, had jurisdiction because there was an appeal from a judgment N.O.V. The new trial action was incidental to the main point.
The appeal will be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.