Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Robert P. Gray, Leslie I. Rogers, Jennings H. Graham, Edwardy. Osborne, D/b/a Gray, Rogers, Graham Andosborne, Petitioners, v. National Labor Relations Board, Respondent
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. - 295 F.2d 38
Oct. 5, 1961
On Petition for Review and Cross-Petition for Enforcement of an Order of the National Labor Relations Board.
McNealy, Merdes & Camarot, Fairbanks, Alaska, for petitioner.
Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel for N.L.R.B., Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Melvin Pollack and James A. Ryan, Attorneys for N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., Charles Henderson, Atty. for N.L.R.B., Seattle, Wash., for respondent.
Before CHAMBERS, HAMLIN and KOELSCH, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The case involves two temporary employees in a very small operation. We are unable to find sufficient jurisdictional basis for enforcement of the proposed order or that enforcement would effectuate the purposes of the National Labor Relations Act. Cf. N.L.R.B. v. Trama, 9 Cir., 1961, 293 F.2d 28; and N.L.R.B. v. Grunwald-Marx, Inc., 9 Cir., 290 F.2d 210.