Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Roger Marcel Callahan, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. - 297 F.2d 79
December 13, 1961
Roger Callahan, Danbury, Conn., for appellant.
William L. Bowers, Jr., Asst. U.S. Atty., Houston, Tex., Woodrow Seals, U. S. Atty., Houston, Tex., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, and HUTCHESON and JONES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from an order denying without hearing a motion to set aside a judgment of conviction under 28 U.S. C.A. § 2255.
Appellant alleges that at the time he was tried, he was a fugitive from a state mental institution and was not mentally competent to enter a plea of guilty. It is apparent that the trial court sought to the best of its ability with the appellant before it ready to plead guilty to determine whether appellant was of sound mind. No plea raising the issue of sanity was before the court. Appellant pleaded guilty. Of course, appellant's statement to the trial court that he considered himself of sound mind would be no bar to his actually proving, if such were the case, that he lacked the mental ability to defend himself. By virtue of our opinion in Gregori v. United States, 5th Cir., 243 F.2d 48 and our recent decision in Corbett v. United States, 296 F.2d 131, the judgment of the trial court must be reversed and the case must be remanded for a hearing on the motion for Section 2255 relief.
Judgment is
Reversed.