|
Citation
|
Date
|
Circuit
|
Parties
|
|
299 F.2d 22
|
|
|
Aaron Rosenzweig, Complainant, v. General Services Administration of the United States of America, Bernard L.
Boutin, Administrator, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 30
|
|
Seventh
|
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Paul L. Temple, Defendant-appellant
|
|
299 F.2d 30
|
|
Seventh
|
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Paul L. Temple, Defendant-appellant
|
|
299 F.2d 33
|
|
Second
|
Societe Comptoir De L'industrie Cotonniere Etablissementsboussac, Christian Dior, Societe a
Responsabilitelimitee, Paris, and Christian Dior Newyork, Incorporated,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Alexander's Department Stores, Inc., Defendant-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 33
|
|
Second
|
Societe Comptoir De L'industrie Cotonniere Etablissements Boussac, Christian Dior, Societe a Responsabilite
Limitee, Paris, and Christian Dior New York, Incorporated, Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Alexander's Department Stores, Inc., Defendant-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 37
|
|
Fifth
|
Opelika Royal Crown Bottling Company, a Partnership, Andgriffin Mcginty, Appellants, v. Arthur J. Goldberg,
Secretary of Labor, United Statesdepartment of Labor, Appellee.arthur J. Goldberg, Secretary of Labor, United Statesdepartment of Labor, Appellant, v. Opelika Royal Crown Bottling
Company, a Partnership, Andgriffin Mcginty, Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 37
|
|
Fifth
|
Opelika Royal Crown Bottling Company, a Partnership, and Griffin Mcginty, Appellants, v. Arthur J. Goldberg,
Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Appellee.arthur J. Goldberg, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Appellant, v. Opelika Royal Crown Bottling
Company, a Partnership, and Griffin Mcginty, Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 45
|
|
Sixth
|
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Charles Isaac Benson, Defendant-appellant.united States of
America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Willie Bedford Benson, Defendant-appellant
|
|
299 F.2d 45
|
|
Sixth
|
United States of America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Charles Isaac Benson, Defendant-appellant.united States of
America, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Willie Bedford Benson, Defendant-appellant
|
|
299 F.2d 47
|
|
Ninth
|
John M. Shubin and Peter S. Shubin, Petitioners, v. the United States District Court for the Southern
District of California, Central Division, Respondent, Ands. Vincen Bowles, Inc., Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 47
|
|
Ninth
|
John M. Shubin and Peter S. Shubin, Petitioners, v. the United States District Court for the Southern
Districtof California, Central Division, Respondent, Ands. Vincen Bowles, Inc., Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 48
|
|
Seventh
|
Walter M. Sheldon and Laura Sheldon, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 48
|
|
Seventh
|
Walter M. Sheldon and Laura Sheldon, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 50
|
|
Third
|
Joso Milutin, Appellant v. E. P. Bouchard, District Director for the New Jersey District, Immigration and
Naturalization Service
|
|
299 F.2d 50
|
|
Third
|
Joso Milutin, Appellant v. E. P. Bouchard, District Director for Thenew Jerseydistrict, Immigration and
Naturalization Service.no. ,13651
|
|
299 F.2d 55
|
|
Ninth
|
The Creamette Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Appellant,v, Joseph Merlino, a Sole Trader Doing Business
Asmajor Italian Foods Company, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 55
|
|
Ninth
|
The Creamette Company, a Minnesota Corporation, Appellant, v. Joseph Merlino, a Sole Trader Doing Business As
Major Italian Foods Company, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 60
|
|
Sixth
|
Stanley Gafford, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Trans-texas Airways, Defendant-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 60
|
|
Sixth
|
Stanley Gafford, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Trans-texas Airways, Defendant-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 65
|
|
Second
|
Harold C. Ackert, As Trustee for the Benefit of Laura B. Smith, Petitioner, v. Honorable Frederick Van Pelt
Bryan, District Judge, United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 65
|
|
Second
|
Harold C. Ackert, As Trustee for the Benefit of Laura B.smith, Petitioner, v. Honorable Frederick Van Pelt
Bryan, District Judge, Unitedstates District Court for the Southern District Ofnew York, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 74
|
|
Fifth
|
United States of America and Jeanette E. Gondeck,intervenor, Appellants, v. Pan American World Airways
Incorporated and the Travelersinsurance Company, Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 74
|
|
Fifth
|
United States of America and Jeanette E. Gondeck, Intervenor, Appellants, v. Pan American World Airways
Incorporated and the Travelers Insurance Company, Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 78
|
|
Second
|
Phyllis A. Bergeron, As Administratrix of the Estates of Nancy M. Guy, Deceased, Kenneth Charles Guy,
Deceased, and Elaine Barbara Guy, Deceased, Plaintiff-libelant-appellant, v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij, N. v. , Also Known As Klm/ Royal Dutch Airlines,
Defendant-respondent-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 78
|
|
Second
|
Phyllis A. Bergeron, As Administratrix of the Estates Ofnancy M. Guy, Deceased, Kenneth Charles Guy,deceased,
and Elaine Barbara Guy,deceased, Plaintiff-libelant-appellant, v. Koninklijke Luchtvaart Maatschappij, N. v. , Also Known Asklm/royal Dutch Airlines,
Defendant-respondent-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 79
|
|
Ninth
|
Caddy-imler Creations, Inc., Appellant, v. John D. Caddy, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 79
|
|
Ninth
|
Caddy-imler Creations, Inc., Appellant, v. John D. Caddy, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 84
|
|
Eighth
|
May Broadcasting Company, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 84
|
|
Eighth
|
May Broadcasting Company, Petitioner, v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 92
|
|
Fourth
|
United States of America, Appellee, v. Joseph Lemon Boyette, Bert Franklin Mooring, and Temasia Bruce Hill
Mooring, Appellants
|
|
299 F.2d 92
|
|
Fourth
|
United States of America, Appellee, v. Joseph Lemon Boyette, Bert Franklin Mooring, and Temasiabruce Hill
Mooring, Appellants
|
|
299 F.2d 98
|
|
Ninth
|
Joe Larios, Appellant, v. P. J. Madigan, Warden, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 98
|
|
Ninth
|
Joe Larios, Appellant, v. P. J. Madigan, Warden, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 101
|
|
Third
|
Ralph Rosania, Appellant, v. the State of New Jersey
|
|
299 F.2d 101
|
|
Third
|
Ralph Rosania, Appellant, v. the State of New Jersey
|
|
299 F.2d 102
|
|
Ninth
|
Elias Miller, Paul Miller, Anna Miller, and Helen Miller;and Elias Miller and Paul Miller, As Executors
Ofthe Estate of George Miller, Deceased, Appellants, v. Irving Sulmeyer, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate Ofdelcon Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, D/b/amiller Engineering Co.,
Bankrupt, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 102
|
|
Ninth
|
Elias Miller, Paul Miller, Anna Miller, and Helen Miller; and Elias Miller and Paul Miller, As Executors of
the Estate of George Miller, Deceased, Appellants, v. Irving Sulmeyer, Trustee in Bankruptcy of the Estate of Delcon Corporation, a Nevada Corporation, D/b/a Miller Engineering Co.,
Bankrupt, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 105
|
|
Fifth
|
Virginia Lawrence Bland and Raymond Lee Wilson, Appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 105
|
|
Fifth
|
Virginia Lawrence Bland and Raymond Lee Wilson, Appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 111
|
|
DC
|
Willmut Gas and Oil Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, United Gas Pipe
Linecompany, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas Gastransmission Corporation, City of Memphis and the Memphislight, Gas and Water Division, Louisville Gas and Electriccompany,
Intervenors.mississippi Valley Gas Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, United Gas Pipe Linecompany, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas
Gastransmission Corporation, City of Memphis and the Memphislight, Gas and Water Division, Louisville Gas and Electriccompany, Intervenors.philadelphis Electric Company and the
United Gas Improvementcompany, Petitioners, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, United Gas Pipe Linecompany, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texasgas Transmission
Corporation, Louisvillegas and Electric Company, Intervenors
|
|
299 F.2d 111
|
|
DC
|
Willmut Gas and Oil Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent,united Gas Pipe Line
Company, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas Gas Transmission Corporation, City of Memphis and the Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division, Louisville Gas and Electric Company,
Intervenors.mississippi Valley Gas Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent,united Gas Pipe Line Company, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas Gas
Transmission Corporation, City of Memphis and the Memphis Light, Gas and Water Division, Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Intervenors.philadelphia Electric Company and the
United Gas Improvement Company, Petitioners, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent,united Gas Pipe Line Company, Mississippi River Fuel Corporation, Texas Gas Transmission
Corporation, Louisville Gas and Electric Company, Intervenors
|
|
299 F.2d 113
|
|
DC
|
Georgia D. Johnson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry W.spaulding, Deceased, Appellant, v. Roy
Spaulding, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 113
|
|
DC
|
Georgia D. Johnson, Administratrix of the Estate of Henry W. Spaulding, Deceased, Appellant, v. Roy
Spaulding, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 114
|
|
DC
|
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-cio, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board,
Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 114
|
|
DC
|
International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-cio, Petitioner, v. National Labor Relations Board,
Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 117
|
|
DC
|
Robert W. Gordan, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 117
|
|
DC
|
Robert W. Gordan, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 119
|
|
DC
|
Nedrick Young et al., Appellants, v. Motion Picture Association of America, Inc., et al., Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 119
|
|
DC
|
Nedrick Young et al., Appellants, v. Motion Picture Association of America, Inc., et al., Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 122
|
|
DC
|
Joseph Nance, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 122
|
|
DC
|
Joseph Nance, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 124
|
|
DC
|
Anchor Line Limited et al., Petitioners, v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America,
Respondents
|
|
299 F.2d 124
|
|
DC
|
Anchor Line Limited et al., Petitioners, v. Federal Maritime Commission and United States of America,
Respondents
|
|
299 F.2d 126
|
|
DC
|
Mid-america Pipeline Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent, Northern Natural
Gascompany, Intervenor
|
|
299 F.2d 126
|
|
DC
|
Eugene S. Caplan, Appellant, v. John B. Connally et al., Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 126
|
|
DC
|
Eugene S. Caplan, Appellant, v. John B. Connally et al., Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 126
|
|
DC
|
Mid-america Pipeline Company, Petitioner, v. Federal Power Commission, Respondent,northern Natural Gas
Company, Intervenor
|
|
299 F.2d 127
|
|
DC
|
R. A. Holman & Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al., Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 127
|
|
DC
|
R. A. Holman & Co., Inc., Appellant, v. Securities and Exchange Commission et al., Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 133
|
|
DC
|
Association of Western Railways et al., Appellants, v. Riss & Company, Inc., Appellee.the Atchison,
Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company et al., Appellants, v. Riss & Company, Inc., Appellee.association of Western Railways, Traffic Executiveassociation-easternrailroads,
Eastern Railroad Presidentsconference, Carl Byoir and Associates,inc., and Thepennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellants, v. Riss & Company, Inc., Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 133
|
|
DC
|
Association of Western Railways et al., Appellants, v. Riss & Company, Inc., Appellee.the Atchison,
Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Company et al., Appellants, v. Riss & Company, Inc., Appellee.association of Western Railways, Traffic Executive Association-eastern Railroads,
Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference, Carl Byoir and Associates, Inc.,and the Pennsylvania Railroad Company, Appellants, v. Riss & Company, Inc., Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 136
|
|
DC
|
Morrell J. Roddy, Petitioner, v. Civil Aeronautics Board and the Administrator of the Federalaviation
Agency, Respondents
|
|
299 F.2d 136
|
|
DC
|
Morrell J. Roddy, Petitioner, v. Civil Aeronautics Board and the Administrator of the Federal Aviation
Agency, Respondents
|
|
299 F.2d 137
|
|
DC
|
National Association of Trailer Owners, Inc., Appellant, v. J. Edward Day, Postmaster General of the United
States, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 137
|
|
DC
|
National Association of Trailer Owners, Inc., Appellant, v. J. Edward Day, Postmaster General of the United
States, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 141
|
|
Tenth
|
Richard L. Marshall, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 141
|
|
Tenth
|
Richard L. Marshall, Appellant, v. United States of America, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 142
|
|
Eighth
|
Minnesota Amusement Company, a Corporation, Appellant, v. John Fred Larkin, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 142
|
|
Eighth
|
Minnesota Amusement Company, a Corporation, Appellant, v. John Fred Larkin, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 154
|
|
Eighth
|
Sears, Roebuck and Co., a Corporation, Appellant, v. Mabel Daniels, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 154
|
|
Eighth
|
Sears, Roebuck and Co., a Corporation, Appellant, v. Mabel Daniels, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 160
|
|
Ninth
|
Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners Doing Business Under the Firm Name of Radiant Color
Company, Appellants, v. Switzer Brothers, Inc., a Corporation, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 160
|
|
Ninth
|
Harry P. Locklin and Elmer J. Brant, General Partners Doingbusiness Under the Firm Name of Radiant
Colorcompany, Appellants, v. Switzer Brothers, Inc., a Corporation, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 170
|
|
Fourth
|
Aurweid George Reickauer, Appellant, v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent Virginia Statepenitentiary,
Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 170
|
|
Fourth
|
Aurweid George Reickauer, Appellant, v. W. K. Cunningham, Jr., Superintendent Virginia State Penitentiary,
Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 173
|
|
Fifth
|
George Dedmon, Appellant, v. Falls Products Incorporated et al., Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 173
|
|
Fifth
|
George Dedmon, Appellant, v. Falls Products Incorporated et al., Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 179
|
|
Ninth
|
Elizabeth Ann Duncan, Appellant, v. Iverne E. Carter, Superintendent of the California Institution for Women
at Corona, California, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 179
|
|
Ninth
|
Elizabeth Ann Duncan, Appellant, v. Iverne E. Carter, Superintendent of the Californiainstitution for Women
Atcorona, California, Appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 185
|
|
Second
|
Eleanor Strubbe, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Adolph Sonnenschein, Isidor Sonnenschein and Harry L.bermack,
Co-partners Doing Business As Stratfordfactors, and Metropolitan Life Insurancecompany, Defendants-appellants
|
|
299 F.2d 185
|
|
Second
|
Eleanor Strubbe, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Adolph Sonnenschein, Isidor Sonnenschein and Harry L. Bermack,
Co-partners Doing Business As Stratford Factors, and Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, Defendants-appellants
|
|
299 F.2d 193
|
|
Fifth
|
Charlie Ervin Waller, Appellant, v. Professional Insurance Corporation, J. R. Reinhardt and J. Edwin Larson,
Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 193
|
|
Fifth
|
Charlie Ervin Waller, Appellant, v. Professional Insurance Corporation, J. R. Reinhardt and J.edwin Larson,
Appellees
|
|
299 F.2d 195
|
|
Seventh
|
International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft Andagricultural Implement Workers of America, Local391,
Plaintiff-appellee, v. Webster Electric Company, a Corporation, Defendant-appellant
|
|
299 F.2d 195
|
|
Seventh
|
International Union, United Automobile, Aircraft and Agricultural Implement Workers of America, Local 391,
Plaintiff-appellee, v. Webster Electric Company, a Corporation, Defendant-appellant
|
|
299 F.2d 199
|
|
Eighth
|
Gravois Planing Mill Company, Charles A. and Florencebeckemeier, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 199
|
|
Eighth
|
Gravois Planing Mill Company, Charles A. and Florence Beckemeier, Petitioners, v. Commissioner of Internal
Revenue, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 212
|
|
Second
|
Association for the Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc.,and Association for the Preservation of Freedom
Ofchoice Legal Educational Fund, Inc.,plaintiffs-appellants, v. Caroline K. Simon, Individually and As Secretary of State,new York State, Defendant-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 212
|
|
Second
|
Association for the Preservation of Freedom of Choice, Inc., and Association for the Preservation of Freedom
of Choice Legal Educational Fund, Inc., Plaintiffs-appellants, v. Caroline K. Simon, Individually and As Secretary of State, New York State, Defendant-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 215
|
|
Seventh
|
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Plaintiff Appellee, v. American Fidelity and Casualty Co.,
Defendant-appellant
|
|
299 F.2d 215
|
|
Seventh
|
United States Fidelity and Guaranty Co., Plaintiff-appellee, v. American Fidelity and Casualty Co.,
Defendant-appellant
|
|
299 F.2d 217
|
|
Seventh
|
Tom Morgano, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Alva Pilliod, District Director of Immigration and Naturalization
Service, Chicago, Illinois, Defendant-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 217
|
|
Seventh
|
Tom Morgano, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Alva Pilliod, District Director of Immigration Andnaturalization
Service, Chicago, Illinois,defendant-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 220
|
|
Seventh
|
United States Association of Credit Bureaus, Inc., a Corporation, and John W. Burns, and Harold E. Holder,
Individually and As Officers of Said Corporation, Petitioners, v. Federal Trade Commission, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 220
|
|
Seventh
|
United States Association of Credit Bureaus, Inc., Acorporation, and John W. Burns, and Harold E.holder,
Individually and As Officers Ofsaid Corporation, Petitioners, v. Federal Trade Commission, Respondent
|
|
299 F.2d 223
|
|
Seventh
|
Fife Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Stanford Engineering Co., Defendant-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 223
|
|
Seventh
|
Fife Manufacturing Company, Plaintiff-appellant, v. Stanford Engineering Co., Defendant-appellee
|
|
299 F.2d 227
|
|
Second
|
The City of New York, Libelant-appellee, v. Mcallister Brothers, Inc., Respondent-appellant
|
|
299 F.2d 227
|
|
Second
|
The City of New York, Libelant-appellee, v. Mcallister Brothers, Inc., Respondent-appellant
|
|
299 F.2d 229
|
|
Seventh
|
National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Aurora City Lines, Inc., Respondent
|