Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Budget Dress Corp., Plaintiff-appellant, v. Joint Board of Dress and Waistmakers' Union of Greater New York and Its Constituent Locals, and Charles S. Zimmerman, Nathaniel M. Minkoff and Leon Namenwirth, Individually and As General Manager, Secretary-treasurer and President, Respectively, of the Joint Board of Dress and Waistmakers' Union of Greater New York; the International Ladies' Garment Workers' Union, Afl-cio; and the Popular Priced Dress Manufacturers' Group, Inc., Defendants-appellees
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. - 299 F.2d 936
Argued February 23, 1962 Decided March 9, 1962
Appeal from summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, Sylvester J. Ryan, Chief Judge. Plaintiff appeals from an order dismissing its action to recover monies allegedly paid in violation of the Labor Management Relations Act.
Morris J. Fellner, New York City (Fellner & Rovins, New York City, on brief), for appellant.
Emil Schlesinger, New York City (Schlesinger & Bloom, New York City, on brief), for appellees Joint Board et al. (Morris P. Glushien, New York City, on brief), for appellee ILGWU (Phillips, Nizer, Benjamin, Krim & Ballon, New York City, on brief), for appellee, Popular Association.
Before MOORE, FRIENDLY and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant seeks to recover monies paid into certain health, welfare and retirement funds on the grounds the payments violated section 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C.A. § 186. On the basis of Minkoff v. Scranton Frocks, Inc., D.C., 181 F.Supp. 542, aff'd per curiam 279 F.2d 115 (2 Cir. 1960) and the opinion of Chief Judge Ryan in the present case insofar as it deals with the merits of appellant's claim under Section 302, we affirm, 198 F.Supp. 4.