Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News
Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Thomas Reddy, Plaintiff-appellant, v. United States of America, Defendant-appellee
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. - 303 F.2d 29
Argued April 25, 1962 Decided May 18, 1962
Samuel Weingrad, New York City, for plaintiff-appellant.
Philip Silverman, Asst. U. S. Atty., Brooklyn, N. Y. (Joseph P. Hoey, U. S. Atty., for the E. D. of New York, Brooklyn, N. Y., on the brief), for defendant-appellee.
Before MOORE, SMITH and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant, claiming to have been struck and injured by a government Post Office vehicle, appeals from a judgment for defendant upon the ground that it is against the weight of credible evidence. After hearing the testimony of plaintiff, the driver of defendant's Post Office tractor-trailer, a police officer who took brief statements from plaintiff and the driver, the driver of a cement mixer who observed the tractor-trailer passing the mixer and a mechanic who tested the tractor-trailer's brakes, the trial court concluded that the operator of the government vehicle "acted with reasonable prudence under the circumstances and that the negligence of the plaintiff contributed to the happening of the accident." A review of the entire transcript and the exhibits received in evidence supports the trial court's opinion that the credible evidence shows that plaintiff, a pedestrian, while attempting to cross a vehicular roadway between street intersections, became confused upon the approach of defendant's vehicle and that the swerving to the left by the truck was an attempt by the driver to avoid the accident. Plaintiff failed to sustain his burden of proving defendant to have been negligent.
Judgment affirmed.