Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Harold A. Boire, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National Labor Relations Board, Appellant, v. the Greyhound Corporation, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. - 309 F.2d 397
November 21, 1962
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; Joseph P. Lieb, Judge.
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, James C. Paras, Washington, D. C., Stuart Rothman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Assoc. Gen. Counsel, Herman M. Levy, Attys., National Labor Relations Board, for appellant.
Warren E. Hall, Jr., Chesterfield H. Smith, Wofford H. Stidham, Bartow, Fla., for appellee.
Alexander E. Wilson, Jr., Alexander E. Wilson, III, Atlanta, Ga. (Wilson, Branch & Barwick, Atlanta, Ga., of counsel) as amicus curiae and on behalf of Floors, Inc.
I. J. Gromfine, Washington, D. C. (Zimring, Gromfine & Sternstein, Washington, D. C., of counsel) as amicus curiae, and on behalf of Amalgamated Association of Street, Electric Railway and Motor Coach Employees of America, AFL-CIO.
Before JONES and BELL, Circuit Judges, and CARSWELL, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
The questions in this important case were carefully considered by the district court and discussed by the judge to whom the case was assigned. Greyhound Corporation v. Boire, D.C., 205 F.Supp. 686. We find ourselves in agreement with the principles there stated and the decision there reached. The judgment of the district court is
Affirmed.