Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Raymond Rodriguez-de Leon, Petitioner, v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, Respondent
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. - 324 F.2d 311
November 14, 1963
David C. Marcus, Los Angeles, Cal., for petitioner.
Francis C. Whelan, U. S. Atty., Donald A. Fareed, Asst. U. S. Atty., Chief of Civil Section, and Jacqueline L. Weiss, Asst. U. S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., for respondent.
Before BROWNING and DUNIWAY, Circuit Judges, and MATHES, District Judge.
DUNIWAY, Circuit Judge.
Petitioner seeks review of a final order of deportation. He did not, however, exhaust his administrative remedies by appeal to the Board of Immigration Appeals. Under these circumstances, his petition must be dismissed. Siaba-Fernandez v. Rosenberg, 9 Cir., 1962, 302 F.2d 139; Murillo-Aguilera v. Immigration and Naturalization Service, 9 Cir., 1963, 313 F.2d 141. Section 10(c) of the Administrative Procedure Act (5 U.S.C. § 1009(c)) is of no help to petitioner. It applies "except as otherwise expressly required by statute." Here the statute, section 106(c) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, (8 U.S.C. § 1105a(c)) does otherwise expressly require.
Dismissed.