Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
United States of America, Appellee, v. First National City Bank, Appellant, and Omar, S.a., Auruguayan Corporation, Lazard Freres & Co., Lehman Brothers,belgian-american Banking Corp., Belgian-american Bank Andtrust Co., and First National City Trust Co., Defendants
United States Court of Appeals Second Circuit. - 325 F.2d 1020
Argued Oct. 18, 1963.Decided Jan. 13, 1964
Louis F. Oberdorfer, Asst. Atty. Gen., Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C. (Harold C. Wilkenfeld, Michael A. Mulroney and Timothy B. Dyk, Attys., Dept. of Justice, Robert M. Morgenthau, U.S. Atty., for the Southern District of New York, Robert Arum and Stephen Charnas, asst. U.S. Attys. on the brief), for appellee.
Henry Harfield, New York City (Shearman & Sterling, Herman E. Compter and John E. Hoffman, Jr., New York City, on the brief), for appellant.
Milbank, Tweed, Hadley & McCloy, New York City (Roy C. Haberkern, Jr., and Isaac Shapiro, New York City, of counsel), for The Chase Manhattan Bank.
Breed, Abbott & Morgan, New York City (Edward J. Ross, New York City, of counsel), for The First National Bank of Boston.
Meyer, Kissel, Matz & Seward, New York City (Lester Kissel, New York City, of counsel), for Bank of America Nat. Trust and Savings Assoc., as amici curiae.
Before LUMBARD, Chief Judge, CLARK, WATERMAN, MOORE, FRIENDLY, SMITH, HAYS and MARSHALL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
The court having set in banc to hear the appeal, with the exception of Judge Kaufman who did not participate, and due deliberation having been had thereon, Judges Lumbard, Waterman, Moore, and Friendly vote to reverse the order of the district court for the reasons set forth in Judge Moore's opinion reported at 321 F.2d 14, and Judges Smith, Hays, and Marshall vote to Affirm for the reasons set forth in Judge Hays' opinion reported at 321 F.2d 25.1 The order of the district court, reported at 210 F.Supp. 773 (1962), is accordingly reversed.
Upon application therefor. The court will grant a stay, pursuant to Rule 28(c), pending application for certiorari to the Supreme Court of the United States.