Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Elizabeth De Gaster, Joseph Philips and George Philips, Individually, and As Administrator with the Will Annexed, of the Estate of Philip Philips, Deceased, and of the Estate of Adolph Philips, Deceased, Respectively, Appellants, v. Henry H. Fowler, As Secretary of the Treasury of the United States of America, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals District of Columbia Circuit. - 354 F.2d 515
November 23, 1965
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia; William B. Jones, Judge. 247 F.Supp. 511 (1963).
Mr. Samuel Herman, with whom Mr. William H. Collins, Washington, D. C., was on the brief, for appellants.
Mr. John C. Eldridge, Attorney, Department of Justice, with whom Asst. Atty. Gen. John W. Douglas, Mr. John C. Conliff, Jr., U. S. Atty. at the time the brief was filed, and Mr. Morton Hollander, Attorney, Department of Justice, were on the brief, for appellee.
Before WRIGHT, TAMM and LEVENTHAL, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This case came on to be heard on the record on appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia, and was argued by counsel.
On consideration whereof, and this court being in general agreement with the excellent opinion filed by the District Court in this case,
It is ordered and adjudged by this court that the judgment of the District Court appealed from in this case be, and it is hereby, affirmed.