Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Charles S. Sullivan and Camp Hill Lumber Company, Inc., Appellants, v. W. Willard Wirtz, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. - 359 F.2d 426
April 11, 1966 Rehearing Denied May 11, 1966
Ruth S. Sullivan, Dadeville, Ala., for appellants.
Bessie Margolin, Associate Sol., Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., Oliver M. Cooper, Jr., Atty., Dept. of Labor, Atlanta, Ga., Charles Donahue, Sol. of Labor, Robert E. Nagle, Atty., Beverley R. Worrell, Regional Attorney, United States Dept. of Labor, Washington, D. C., for appellee.
Before TUTTLE, Chief Judge, THORNBERRY, Circuit Judge, and LYNNE, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant here makes a direct appeal that this court reverse its recent decision in Wirtz v. Jones, et al., 5 Cir., 340 F.2d 901, in which we held that the VIIth Amendment does not confer a right to a jury trial in an action filed by the Secretary of Labor under Section 17 of the Fair Labor Standards Act for the restraint of a withholding of wage underpayments found by the court to be due employees under the Fair Labor Standards Act.
There having intervened no new statute law, nor any Supreme Court decision, this court declines to depart from the principle of stare decisis and consider reaching a different result.
The judgment is affirmed.