Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google
Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo!
Web Search
in the News
Google
News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google
Blog Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google
Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Lumbermens Mutual Casualty Company et al., Appellants, v. Babcock & Wilcox Company et al., Appellees
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. - 366 F.2d 187
September 12, 1966
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Montana; William D. Murray, District Judge.
J. C. Garlington, Garlington, Lohn & Robinson, Missoula, Mont., for appellants.
Karl Karlberg, Boone & Karlberg, Missoula, Mont., for appellee Babcock & Wilcox Co.
Edward Alexander, Hall, Alexander & Kuenning, Great Falls, Mont., for appellee Clarage Fan Co.
Before JERTBERG, DUNIWAY and ELY, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether the trial court's findings of fact are clearly erroneous within the meaning of Rule 52(a) F.R.Civ.P., as construed and applied by us in Lundgren v. Freeman, 9 Cir., 1962, 307 F.2d 104, 113-115. We have carefully examined the transcript of the testimony, the depositions that were received in evidence, and the written exhibits, and we conclude that the court's findings are not clearly erroneous.
Affirmed.