Case Resources
Search this Case
in
Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web
Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google
News Archive Search
Yahoo!
News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati
Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book
Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Ronald Mcconnell, Appellant, v. Wayne K. Patterson, Warden, Colorado State Penitentiary, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit. - 370 F.2d 41
Dec. 16, 1966
Howard K. Berry, Jr., Oklahoma City, Okl., of Berry & Berry, Oklahoma City, Okl., for appellant.
James W. Creamer, Jr., Asst. Atty., Gen., Denver, Colo. (Duke W. Dunbar, Atty. Gen., Frank E. Hickey, Deputy Atty. Gen., and George E. DeRoos, Asst. Atty. Gen., Denver, Colo., with him on the brief), for appellee.
Before PICKETT and HICKEY, Circuit Judges, and STANLEY, District Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Appellant McConnell, a prisoner in the Colorado State Penitentiary at Canon City, Colorado, appeals from an order dismissing his petition for writ of habeas corpus entered in the United States District Court for the District of Colorado after an evidentiary hearing. McConnell, with a history of prior civil commitments to a state mental institution, while represented by retained 'capable counsel', was permitted to withdraw his plea of not guilty and not guilty by reason of insanity, and enter a plea of guilty.
It is urged that under the circumstances, the state court, in permitting the accused to enter a plea of guilty without a proceeding to determine his competency, denied him rights guaranteed by the United States Constitution. It is also argued that McConnell's sentence is invalid because it was pronounced in the absence of his attorney, even though an associate attorney was present.
For the reasons stated by the trial court in its opinion, McConnell v. Patterson, D.C., 254 F.Supp. 921, and the Supreme Court of Colorado in McConnell v. People, Colo., 402 P.2d 75, the judgment is affirmed.