Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
National Labor Relations Board, Petitioner, v. Perry Publications, Inc., Palm Beach Post-times Andpensacola News Journal Divisions, Respondents
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. - 375 F.2d 118
March 27, 1967, Rehearing Denied May 25, 1967
Marcel Mallet-Prevost, Asst. Gen. Counsel, Bernard M. Dworski, Atty., Arnold Ordman, Gen. Counsel, Dominick L. Manoli, Associate Gen. Counsel, Nancy M. Sherman, Attys., N.L.R.B., Washington, D.C., for petitioner.
J. R. Goldthwaite, Jr., Atlanta, Ga., for intervenor.
Harrison C. Thompson, Jr., of Shackleford, Farrior, Stallings, Glos & Evans, Tampa, Fla., for respondents.
Before PHILLIPS,1 THORNBERRY and DYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This case is before the court on a petition to enforce an order of the National Labor Relations Board against Perry Publications, Inc., Palm Beach Post-Times and Pensacola News Journal Divisions.
On a consideration of the record as a whole, we are of the opinion that the factual findings and conclusions of the Board are supported by substantial evidence; that such findings and conclusions afford a proper legal basis for the Board's order; and that the record reflects no legal ground on which a denial of enforcement could be predicated.
We think it would serve no useful purpose to delineate the evidentiary facts reflected in four printed volumes of the record.
The order will be enforced.
Of the Tenth Circuit, sitting by designation