Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Alfred Coleman and Edward J. Mcclennan, Appellants, v. United States of America, Appellee, and Stewart L. Udall,secretary of the Interior, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Ninth Circuit. - 379 F.2d 555
June 20, 1967
George Nilsson and Monta W. Shirley, Los Angeles, Cal., for appellants.
William M. Byrne, Jr., U.S. Atty., Los Angeles, Cal., Edwin L. Weisl, Jr., Asst. Atty. Gen., George R. Hyde (argued), Roger P. Marquis, Attys. (argued on rehearing), Lands Division, Department of Justice, Washington, D.C., Stewart Udall, Secretary of the Interior, Washington, D.C., for appellee.
Before CHAMBERS, Chief Judge, JERTBERG, Circuit Judge, and THOMPSON, District Judge.
ORDER
PER CURIAM.
On Rehearing
Following this Court's opinion and decision filed June 21, 1966 (Coleman v. United States, 9th Cir. 1966, 363 F.2d 190), the United States petitioned for a rehearing. The Court then entered an order inviting Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, to move to join as a counterclaim defendant and appellee (See Mullaney v. Anderson, 1952, 342 U.S. 415, 72 S.Ct. 428, 96 L.Ed. 458). Such a motion was made, and an order was entered joining Stewart L. Udall, Secretary of the Interior, as a counterclaim defendant and appellee, and a rehearing was granted. Briefs were filed and oral argument entertained on June 15, 1967.
After thorough reconsideration of the issues involved and the arguments of the opposing parties, the Court adheres to and confirms the opinion and decision filed June 21, 1966.