Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive
Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Aircraftsmen, Inc., Appellant, v. Aircraft Equipment Company, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. - 383 F.2d 988
November 6, 1967
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida; William O. Mehrtens, Judge.
William E. Schuyler, Jr., Washington, D. C., Richard A. Pallot, Miami, Fla., (Pallot, Silver, Pallot & Stern, Miami, Fla., Browne, Schuyler & Beveridge, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant.
James E. Cockfield, Washington, D. C., Thomas H. Anderson, Miami, Fla., (James P. Burns, Burns, Doane, Benedict, Swecker & Mathis, Washington, D. C., Shutts & Bowen, Miami, Fla., on the brief), for appellee.
Before BROWN, Chief Judge, and COLEMAN and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This appeal by the plaintiff below is from a judgment holding United States Letters Patent 2,828,166 invalid and not to have been infringed by defendant-appellee. All issues of law and fact were exhaustively considered and decided by the District Court in a published opinion, 247 F.Supp. 469 (1965). Upon thorough consideration of the appeal, including briefs and fine arguments here, we are left in no doubt that the case was correctly decided. This being so, no worthwhile service is to be accomplished by any paraphrasing of an opinion already published.
The judgment of the District Court, therefore, is
Affirmed.