Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
David Lawrence, Appellant, v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of Corrections, State of Florida, Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. - 401 F.2d 177
September 25, 1968
David Lawrence, pro se.
Arden M. Siegendorf, Asst. Atty. Gen., Miami, Fla., for appellee.
Before COLEMAN, GOLDBERG, and GODBOLD, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
The appellant moves for appointment of counsel to represent him on this appeal. Appellee moves to dismiss the appeal as not timely filed.
Previously this court granted a certificate of probable cause and leave to appeal in forma pauperis although the application for certificate of probable cause was filed in the district court more than 60 days after the date of the order denying writ of habeas corpus. It is now made known to the court by the motion to dismiss the appeal that no notice of appeal was filed until more than 60 days after denial by the district court of writ of habeas corpus.
In pro se cases we have been liberal in accepting informal documents as notice of appeal. But this policy does not override the requirement that notice of appeal must be filed within 30 days, which may be extended by the district court for a period not to exceed an additional 30 days upon showing of excusable neglect. Rule 4, Fed.R.App.Proc. In this case no order was entered extending the 30 day period to 60, the appellant made no application for such an order, and in any event nothing which could serve as notice of appeal was filed until, at the minimum, 63 days. This court has no jurisdiction of the appeal. Allen v. Wainwright, 384 F.2d 745 (5th Cir. 1967); Kapsalis v. Wilson, 380 F.2d 365 (9th Cir.) cert. denied Kapsalis v. Nelson, 389 U.S. 878, 88 S.Ct. 180, 19 L.Ed.2d 168 (1967).
The appeal is dismissed.