Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
A. M. Cohen and Wife, Verbie Lee Cohen, Appellants, v. R. C. Bredehoeft, Fire Marshal of City of Houston, et al., Appellees
United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit. - 402 F.2d 61
October 4, 1968 Rehearing Denied October 29, 1968 Certiorari Denied February 24, 1969
Charles A. Easterling, Presley E. Werlein, Jr., Houston, Tex., for appellants.
Joseph G. Rollins, Sr., Asst. City Atty., Thomas F. Keever, Asst. Atty. Gen., Wm. A. Olson, City Atty., Houston, Tex., for appellees.
Before BELL and SIMPSON, Circuit Judges, and ROBERTS, District Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellants are engaged in the wholesale fireworks business in the City of Houston. The business entails the maintenance of warehouses where fireworks are stored. An ordinance of the City prohibits such storage. Appellants contend that the ordinance is violative of the commerce clause of the federal Constitution, Art. 1, § 8, Cl. 3, and the due process and equal protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution.
The state questions asserted were fully answered, adversely to appellants, in the state courts. Alpha Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Houston, 411 S.W.2d 417 (Tex. Civ.App., Houston 1967), error ref. n. r. e., cert. denied, 389 U.S. 1005, 88 S. Ct. 565, 19 L.Ed.2d 601 (1967). The federal questions presented were the subject matter of a memorandum opinion of the district court and were found to be without merit. Cohen v. Bredehoeft, Fire Marshal, S.D.Tex., 1968, 290 F.Supp. 1001. We agree that the complaint is without redeeming merit. The district court did not err in denying the relief sought.
Affirmed.