Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google Scholar
on the Web
Google Web Search
MSN Web Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News Search
Google News Archive Search
Yahoo! News Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com Search
Google Blog Search
Technorati Blog Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Hazel Tate, Individually, and As Administratrix of the Estate of Peggy Jean Minton, Deceased, Plaintiff-appellee, v. Renault, Inc., Defendant-appellant
United States Court of Appeals Sixth Circuit. - 402 F.2d 795
October 31, 1968
Appeal from the United States District Court, Eastern District of Tennessee; C. G. Neese, Judge, 278 F.Supp. 457.
Howard E. Wilson, Kingsport, Tenn., Wilson, Worley & Gamble, Kingsport, Tenn., of counsel, for appellant.
T. R. Bandy, Jr., Kingsport, Tenn., M. Lacy West, Kingsport, Tenn., on brief, for appellee.
Before WEICK, Chief Judge, and CELEBREZZE and PECK, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM.
This is an appeal from the ruling of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Tennessee, Northeastern Division, that the defendant was subject to in personam jurisdiction, and overruling defendant's motion challenging the jurisdiction of the Court. The defendant perfected its appeal from the interlocutory order of the District Court, pursuant to the order of this Court filed November 9, 1967, granting it permission to appeal under the provisions of Section 1292(b), Title 28 of the United States Code, and Subsection 2 of Rule 8 of this Court.
This is a products liability action for wrongful death, involving the Tennessee "Long-Arm" statute, T.C.A. §§ 20-235 and 20-236; under which Renault, Inc., a New York corporation, was served with process.
Appellant relies on Velandra v. Regie, etc., 336 F.2d 292 (6th Cir. 1964), but as was pointed out in May v. Atlas Magazines, 380 F.2d 58 (6th Cir. 1967), Velandra did not construe the Michigan long arm statute.
We are of the opinion that this case comes within the purview of Southern Machine Co. v. Mohasco Industries, Inc., 401 F.2d 374, decided September 20, 1968, by this Court.
It is therefore ordered that the judgment of the District Court be, and it is, hereby affirmed.