Case Resources
Search this Case
in Google
Scholar
on the Web
Google Web
Search
MSN Web
Search
Yahoo! Web Search
in the News
Google News
Search
Google News
Archive Search
Yahoo! News
Search
in the Blogs
BlawgSearch.com
Search
Google Blog
Search
Technorati Blog
Search
in other Databases
Google Book Search
Justia Research Resources
Justia.com
Supreme Court Center
US Regulation Tracker
US District Court Opinions
Federal District Court Civil Case Filings
Legal Blog Search
Legal Podcast Search
USA Constitution Annotated
Online Research Resources
Cornell LII
Cornell Wex Dictionary & Encyclopedia
LLRX.com - Legal Research
Expert Witness Directory
Nolo Consumer & Business
US Court Forms
WashLaw Directory
World LII
Cases Provided By
Creative Commons
public.resource.org
Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company, Appellant, v. Gerald Minor Mcghee et al., Appellee
United States Court of Appeals Fourth Circuit. - 408 F.2d 4
Argued Feb. 7, 1969.Decided March 4, 1969
Ernest G. Garrett, Jr., Richmond, Va. (George M. Trible, III, and May, Garrett, Miller & Newman, Richmond, Va., on brief) for appellant.
Frank O. Meade, Danville, Va. (Meade, Tate & Meade, Danville, Va., on brief) for appellee.
Before BOREMAN, BRYAN and WINTER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:
This is a declaratory judgment action in which Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company seeks relief from liability under its automobile liability insurance policy issued and delivered to Gerald McGhee under Virginia's Assigned Risk Plan.
Iowa's policy specifically described and covered McGhee's Ford coupe as the sole insured vehicle. While the policy was in force McGhee purchased a 1961 Oldsmobile, transferred the license from the Ford to the Oldsmobile and, although retaining ownership and possession of the Ford which was parked on his premises, drove only the Oldsmobile until it was involved and damaged in an accident.
The question here is whether the Oldsmobile was a replacement vehicle for the Ford and qualified for liability coverage under Iowa's policy which provides, in effect, that a newly acquired automobile is covered if it replaces an automobile then covered by the policy and owned by the insured. Iowa was not notified of the acquisition of the Oldsmobile but it is agreed that the policy did not require the giving of such notice before coverage would attach to the Oldsmobile if, in fact, it replaced the Ford.
The district court found and concluded that the Oldsmobile was a newly acquired automobile which replaced the Ford within the provisions of the Iowa policy; that the Ford was both mechanically and legally 'inoperable'; that there was no double liability coverage; and that only the Oldsmobile was covered under the policy at the time of the accident.1
Upon our examination of the record we find no reversible error. Therefore the judgment below will be
Affirmed.
Iowa National Mutual Insurance Company v. McGhee, 292 F.Supp. 176 (W.D.Va.1968)